Boundaries are explicit
Public pages must state no escrow, no custody, no legal advice, no tax advice, and no hidden automation where those boundaries matter.
Trust explainer
Moral Trade makes proposal terms, evidence expectations, safety boundaries, and review status legible. It does not make moral rankings, hold funds, automate outreach, or promise legal enforceability.
Guarantees
These are the operational claims the site is designed to support in the current pilot phase.
Public pages must state no escrow, no custody, no legal advice, no tax advice, and no hidden automation where those boundaries matter.
Worked examples are separated from live proposals so visitors can learn the format without mistaking examples for liquidity.
Baseline integrity rules reject pay-me-or-I-will-do-harm offers and compensation for stopping newly escalated harmful behavior.
Review states
Illustrative terms only. It can be cloned, but nobody should rely on it as an active agreement.
A participant-stated proposal that still needs baseline, evidence, safety, and counterparty review.
Receipts, logs, attestations, or public statements have been named for reviewer inspection.
A reviewer has checked the named scope, conflicts, proof uniqueness, and challenge window.
Recourse
Challenges, privacy complaints, third-party harms, and safety incidents should enter scoped review lanes. These routes do not mutate live proposal state by themselves; they publish what humans need to review.
Appeals cover 7 reviewed subject types, 6 standing categories, and 8 human-reviewed outcomes.
Disclosure grants cover 9 field types across 3 audience stages, with raw source notes and contact details redacted by default.
Externality review names 8 trigger codes, 6 review standards, and 4 remedy controls before reliance.
Incident response covers 7 incident categories and 4 severity levels, with public summaries kept aggregate and redacted.
Non-guarantees