Skip to main content
Moral Trade
Understand▾
UnderstandStart with the idea, source, and safest first route.
Choose your pathRoute by intent: learn, test an example, donate, or join/build.What is Moral Trade?A plain-language primer for new visitors.How it worksA simple walkthrough from example to review.SourcesPrimary references and product-boundary notes.FAQCommon questions and operating limits.
Explore▾
ExploreInspect what is live enough to read, clone, or donate through.
ProjectsWhat is live, illustrative, or upcoming.Worked examplesSeeded structures, not live offers.All offersLive offers and worked examples.Pledge swapsExchange bounded commitments.Donation offsetsRedirect matched opposed donations.Donate through a routeUse a vetted external donation handoff.
Join▾
JoinMove from examples into one supported pilot action.
Create bounded tradeDraft terms with baseline, exit, evidence, and review gates.Create donation offsetSet baseline, match, destination, surplus, and evidence rules.Create wish profileDescribe broad wishes before mutual disclosure.Founding cohortInvite one serious counterparty and start small.Private matchingConsent-gated counterparty discovery.Create accountUse member workflows after the public primer.
Trust▾
TrustCheck status, review rules, safety boundaries, and recourse.
AboutWhat exists today, what does not, and what comes next.What you can rely onPrototype guarantees, review states, and non-guarantees.Pilot statusWhat is real, reviewed, or still prototype-stage.ValidationEvidence states, challenge windows, and review scopes.SafetyCoercion, fraud, and pressure boundaries.Anti-threat rulesBaseline integrity and externality checks.AccessibilityWCAG-oriented QA scope, limitations, and support route.MeasurementPrivacy-safe event taxonomy and performance baselines.TransparencyAggregate review, disclosure, report, appeal, and operator timing counts.Team and governanceOperator routes, reviewer roles, and public gaps.Pilot updatesPublic logs, governance updates, and case-study notes.ContactReach the pilot operators or report a support issue.
Search
See exampleSign in
  1. Home
  2. Accessibility

Accessibility statement

Accessible review should be part of trust.

Moral Trade aims to make its public pages and core workflows usable with keyboard navigation, clear labels, predictable routes, and assistive technology. The working target is WCAG 2.1 AA-oriented QA, with known limitations tracked openly instead of hidden behind a broad conformance claim.

Report accessibility issueReview QA plan

Current commitment

01
Predictable routes

Navigation labels should lead to real destinations with descriptive titles.

02
Keyboard-first checks

Menus, filters, forms, cards, and recovery states should be reachable without a pointer.

03
Plain recourse

Visitors should know where to report access barriers and what details help operators triage.

QA scope

What accessibility review should cover first

The audit called for manual keyboard and screen-reader QA on navigation, forms, filters, and evidence workflows. These are the first public checkpoints.

Navigation and search

Check skip links, menu disclosure, route labels, site search, focus order, and link purpose across public pages.

Forms and filters

Check labels, instructions, validation messages, keyboard operation, and error recovery on offer, login, registry, and onboarding flows.

Evidence workflows

Check review cards, factor-code lists, status badges, proof upload language, and challenge paths for understandable names and states.

Authenticated background networking

Check the opportunity inbox, consent dialogs, source-summary review, notification settings, and self-serve deletion flow with keyboard and screen-reader scenarios before wider rollout.

Mobile and loading states

Check that route-specific loading and recovery states do not trap keyboard users or hide the first meaningful content.

Current practices

What is already in place

  • Public pages include a skip link target at main content.
  • Core navigation uses consistent Understand, Explore, Join, and Trust buckets.
  • Critical proposal states use visible text labels instead of color alone.
  • Support, safety, privacy, and data-request routes are linked from public trust surfaces.

Known limitations

What should not be overclaimed

  • A full manual screen-reader pass has not yet been published for every authenticated workflow.
  • Numeric Lighthouse accessibility scores are not treated as a substitute for manual keyboard and assistive-technology review.
  • Some prototype workflows still depend on signed-in data states that require scenario-specific QA.
Contact supportReview validation standards

Moral Trade

A pilot institution for cooperation under disagreement.

Moral Trade helps serious participants test small, reviewable commitments across moral disagreement. It does not provide legal, tax, escrow, or custody services.

Marketplace

  • Projects
  • Choose your path
  • Browse offers
  • Worked examples
  • Pledge swaps
  • Donation offsets
  • Donate through a route
  • Public Goods Fund
  • Private matching

Learn

  • About
  • What is moral trade?
  • How it works
  • Methodology
  • Measurement
  • Transparency report
  • Safety policy
  • Anti-threat rules
  • Validation
  • Accessibility
  • Moral Trade technical spec
  • Evidence standards
  • FAQ
  • Deferred paid offers
  • Sources

Community

  • Team and governance
  • People
  • Wish registry
  • Founding cohort
  • Pilot updates
  • Create account
  • Sign in

About

  • Contact
  • Pilot status
  • What you can rely on
  • Transparency report
  • Research and governance
  • Reasoning Center
  • Allocation notes
  • Candidate pools

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Accessibility
  • Safety policy
  • Evidence review

Reference points include Toby Ord's paper on moral trade and Forethought's discussion of convergence, compromise, threats, blockers, and moral public goods.