Skip to main content
Moral Trade
Understand▾
UnderstandStart with the idea, source, and safest first route.
Choose your pathRoute by intent: learn, test an example, donate, or join/build.What is Moral Trade?A plain-language primer for new visitors.How it worksA simple walkthrough from example to review.SourcesPrimary references and product-boundary notes.FAQCommon questions and operating limits.
Explore▾
ExploreInspect what is live enough to read, clone, or donate through.
ProjectsWhat is live, illustrative, or upcoming.Worked examplesSeeded structures, not live offers.All offersLive offers and worked examples.Pledge swapsExchange bounded commitments.Donation offsetsRedirect matched opposed donations.Donate through a routeUse a vetted external donation handoff.
Join▾
JoinMove from examples into one supported pilot action.
Create bounded tradeDraft terms with baseline, exit, evidence, and review gates.Create donation offsetSet baseline, match, destination, surplus, and evidence rules.Create wish profileDescribe broad wishes before mutual disclosure.Founding cohortInvite one serious counterparty and start small.Private matchingConsent-gated counterparty discovery.Create accountUse member workflows after the public primer.
Trust▾
TrustCheck status, review rules, safety boundaries, and recourse.
AboutWhat exists today, what does not, and what comes next.What you can rely onPrototype guarantees, review states, and non-guarantees.Pilot statusWhat is real, reviewed, or still prototype-stage.ValidationEvidence states, challenge windows, and review scopes.SafetyCoercion, fraud, and pressure boundaries.Anti-threat rulesBaseline integrity and externality checks.AccessibilityWCAG-oriented QA scope, limitations, and support route.MeasurementPrivacy-safe event taxonomy and performance baselines.TransparencyAggregate review, disclosure, report, appeal, and operator timing counts.Team and governanceOperator routes, reviewer roles, and public gaps.Pilot updatesPublic logs, governance updates, and case-study notes.ContactReach the pilot operators or report a support issue.
Search
See exampleSign in
  1. Home
  2. Public Goods Fund

Public Goods Fund

Approved demo ordinary-pool alternatives.

These visible demo alternatives satisfy the production direct-working requirement without real-money effects.

Every.org fast routeWebhook before countingReviewer verificationIntegrated checkout planned, not active
Draft pool proposal

How participation works

1. Choose route
Use the Every.org fast route, saved commitment path, or fallback evidence flow.
2. Wait for import
Redirects remain pending until provider webhooks or reviewed evidence arrive.
3. Review before counting
The fund only counts reviewed evidence in contribution state.
Integrated checkout
Planned after provider approval
Technical spec

Consensus and hybrid goods

Filter demo pools by common-ground coordination signals

Consensus goods are framed as shared coordination targets. Hybrid goods can attract support from different moral views for different reasons. These filters affect only the demo directory and do not authorize allocation or payout.

Reset

Private common-ground ordering

Campaign order ranks coordinatability, not moral truth

The selected lens uses private-by-default support signals, cross-cluster breadth, threshold progress, and reviewability to surface overlapping reasons. It does not create a global moral ranking or expose raw support reasons.

Lens
Institutional pluralist
Experiment
common-ground personalization
Ranking boundary
coordinatability only
Privacy
aggregate scores only

Global poverty and health

Global health and basic needs reserve

Consensus good

Moral Trade

A pilot institution for cooperation under disagreement.

Moral Trade helps serious participants test small, reviewable commitments across moral disagreement. It does not provide legal, tax, escrow, or custody services.

Marketplace

  • Projects
  • Choose your path
  • Browse offers
  • Worked examples
  • Pledge swaps
  • Donation offsets
  • Donate through a route
  • Public Goods Fund
  • Private matching

Learn

  • About
  • What is moral trade?
  • How it works
  • Methodology
  • Measurement
  • Transparency report
  • Safety policy
  • Anti-threat rules
  • Validation
  • Accessibility
  • Moral Trade technical spec
  • Evidence standards
  • FAQ
  • Deferred paid offers
  • Sources

Community

  • Team and governance
  • People
  • Wish registry
  • Founding cohort
  • Pilot updates
  • Create account
  • Sign in

About

  • Contact
  • Pilot status
  • What you can rely on
  • Transparency report
Default intensity 36%
Common-ground 78%
payable

A demo ordinary-pool alternative representing cost-effective poverty, health, and basic-needs interventions.

Many moral views value reducing severe poverty and preventable illness, even when they disagree about other priorities.

Verified direct
$275
Verified supporters
3/3
Base unlock
$275
Bonus range
$274.97

Discovery basis: cross cluster support, weak common ground support, selected cluster affinity, verified breadth signal, threshold unlock visible, reviewable campaign.

View pool

Long-run future

Existential-risk resilience reserve

Hybrid goodDefault intensity 30%Common-ground 63%threshold pending

A demo ordinary-pool alternative for projects that reduce catastrophic or existential risk without live disbursement.

Preserving the option of a flourishing future is broadly valuable across many longtermist, humanitarian, and pluralist views.

Verified direct
$360
Verified supporters
2/3
Base unlock
$0
Bonus range
$0

Discovery basis: cross cluster support, weak common ground support, selected cluster affinity, verified breadth signal, threshold unlock visible, reviewable campaign.

View pool

Epistemics and institutions

Public-interest knowledge reserve

Consensus + hybrid goodDefault intensity 12%Common-ground 57%expired

A demo ordinary-pool alternative for knowledge infrastructure that helps diverse moral communities reason and coordinate.

Better shared knowledge can improve coordination and allocation decisions across otherwise conflicting moral views.

Verified direct
$90
Verified supporters
1/2
Base unlock
$0
Bonus range
$0

Discovery basis: cross cluster support, weak common ground support, selected cluster affinity, verified breadth signal, reviewable campaign.

View pool

Animal welfare

Animal welfare transition reserve

Hybrid goodDefault intensity 22%Common-ground 51%payable

A demo ordinary-pool alternative for reducing intense animal suffering while preserving ordinary pilot safeguards.

Many moral views assign at least some weight to avoiding severe suffering, including nonhuman suffering.

Verified direct
$225
Verified supporters
3/3
Base unlock
$225
Bonus range
$225.03

Discovery basis: cross cluster support, weak common ground support, verified breadth signal, threshold unlock visible, reviewable campaign, dissent review visible.

View pool

Sign in to persist this workflow across sessions. Account records: 0 public-goods pledges, 0 sponsor-pool refills, 0 legacy pledges, 0 monthly commitments, 0 proposals, 0 ballots.

Pool reasoning

Draft a candidate pool reasoning

Complete the pool reasoning fields before saving or submitting. This route performs no live authorization, payout, or real-money accounting.

Visible demo pools

Global health

Many moral views value reducing severe poverty and preventable illness, even when they disagree about other priorities.

View

Existential risk

Preserving the option of a flourishing future is broadly valuable across many longtermist, humanitarian, and pluralist views.

View

Animal welfare

Many moral views assign at least some weight to avoiding severe suffering, including nonhuman suffering.

View

Knowledge

Better shared knowledge can improve coordination and allocation decisions across otherwise conflicting moral views.

View
  • Research and governance
  • Reasoning Center
  • Allocation notes
  • Candidate pools

    • Legal

    • Privacy
    • Terms
    • Accessibility
    • Safety policy
    • Evidence review

    Reference points include Toby Ord's paper on moral trade and Forethought's discussion of convergence, compromise, threats, blockers, and moral public goods.