Normally complete within 30 days of acceptance; any explicit longer period in either action governs.
Verification
Any mutually agreed public-safe evidence: redacted receipt, dated log, screenshot, photograph, completed work, public link, certificate, or third-party confirmation. Sensitive details may be removed.
State
Live offer
Exposure
Exposure unknown
Condition
Reviewing
Protection
Review current terms
Funding, guarantees and verification
Professional or practical serviceFarmed-animal welfare
Funding and verification details
Exposure unknownDonation receiptNeeds review
State
Live offer
Exposure
Exposure unknown
Condition
Reviewing
Protection
Review current terms
Overview
O67 — Debug one bounded technical issue for up to one hour, where qualified.
Key details
Your action
Executes only after both sides accept frozen terms and evidence requirements.
Charge timing
No payment is authorized from this card. Any future charge requires the existing agreement payment path.
Verification
Any mutually agreed public-safe evidence: redacted receipt, dated log, screenshot, photograph, completed work, public link, certificate, or third-party confirmation. Sensitive details may be removed.
Recipient
Recipient not selected
Verification & funding
Effect on this action: Requires adapter recheck. This is context, not a verdict.
Donation evidence: Receipt from recipient route
Terms before theory
Screening and review context
Review workflow
Why this record can or cannot be relied on yet
Each card exposes the current review state, factor codes, and the next human-controlled step before matching, disclosure, or completion trust.
current status
Awaiting reviewer
Status card
Status: open.
Why this status: the visible status is still a review state, not completion, custody, enforceability, or moral endorsement.
status_visiblehuman_review_required
Next step: Treat this as a review state, not a claim of completion, legal enforceability, custody, or moral endorsement.
action evidence
Awaiting reviewer
Action evidence
Any mutually agreed public-safe evidence: redacted receipt, dated log, screenshot, photograph, completed work, public link, certificate, or third-party confirmation. Sensitive details may be removed.
Why this status: a proof method is named, but the artifact still needs reviewer inspection before reliance.
evidence_rule_namedevidence_sufficiency
Next step: Attach or inspect one scoped artifact for each factual action claim before relying on the record.
baseline confidence
Not assessed
Counterfactual baseline
Not assessed: Review should capture a dated no-trade baseline and any evidence that the agreement changed behavior.
Why this status: a confidence heuristic is not a completed counterfactual review; a reviewer must inspect the dated no-trade evidence.
Catalog pairing O67:R15 · effort L3.
Default terms v1:
Shared financial cap: all offers in which the offer-maker pays or donates draw from one aggregate $500 pool. The maximum stated amount is reserved when both parties confirm an agreement.
Additionality: both parties attest that their promised action was not already firmly planned.
Repeatability: repeatable, but no more than one current instance of this exact offer per counterparty.
Evidence: redacted receipts, dated logs, screenshots, photographs, completed work, public links, certificates, or third-party confirmation are accepted. Personal addresses, account numbers, health details, and unrelated communications may be removed.
Completion: normally within 30 days, with the explicit longer period controlling for monthly or annual commitments.
Basic screen: actions must be lawful, nonviolent, nondeceptive, non-harassing, within the person’s competence, and not materially harm uninvolved parties.
No threats: no offer may demand payment or action in exchange for not starting, continuing, or intensifying harm.
Health and feasibility: diet, transport, abstention, and physical commitments remain subject to medical, disability, religious, employment, caregiving, and safety constraints.
Pairing rule: actions are paired at the same effort level. The parties may still negotiate different terms before confirmation.
Professional or practical serviceFarmed-animal welfareParticipant-stated importance 6/10Counterparty minimum acceptable importance 6+/10Confidence: Low
Not a platform moral ranking. These scores reflect participant-stated views, not Moral Trade's assessment of moral value.
Proposed action
O67 — Debug one bounded technical issue for up to one hour, where qualified.
Requested reciprocal action
R15 — Abstain from chicken and fish for 30 days.
Compromise destination
Not needed
Direct donation route
This offer touches a cause area that currently has a verified Every.org route: ACE Recommended Charity Fund.
Owners can recommend other users' offers from their own offer pages. These public links help people trace trust and substantive overlap.
No linked recommendations yet.
Owner-published recommendations will appear here once they are added.
Questions & discussion
Ask about evidence, the no-trade baseline, timing, limits, or externalities. Questions and replies remain public and linked to member profiles.
Sign in to ask, reply, or vote on public questions.
Have a question? Start the conversation.
Ask for a missing premise, evidence standard, boundary, or clarification.
Guarantees and limits
Guarantees / rules
Executes only if threshold, match, or mutual-acceptance conditions clear.
Authorization is released or no obligation is created if conditions fail.
Evidence is required before reliance when the route names a verification standard.
Reviewer and challenge paths apply where the existing product supports them.
No public exposure by default for private messages, raw evidence, or contact details.
Anti-threat and safety policies apply before commitment reliance.
Limits
Moral value is not guaranteed.
Downstream impact is uncertain.
Counterfactual additionality is estimated, not proven.
Sponsor match may be capped or unavailable.
Tax treatment depends on jurisdiction.
Some information may stay unavailable until review.
Private messages, exact wishes, raw evidence, and contact details stay sign-in or reviewer gated.Saved-offer and interest state is not public by default.
baseline_statedbaseline_credibility
Next step: What would you do if this trade did not happen? Be concrete. Mention your current intention, prior behavior, or any evidence that makes your baseline credible.
externality review
No listed trigger detected
Externality review
Review whether the trade creates third-party harms, bad incentives, or objections from moral views not present in the match.
Why this status: Automatic screening found no listed trigger. This does not establish that third-party harms were reviewed or ruled out.
externality_review_requiredhuman_review_required
Next step: Ask who is affected outside the two parties, what harm pathway exists, and what remedy or challenge window is available.
Next step: This score reflects the participant's own stated priorities. It is not a platform judgment about objective moral value.
appeal scope
Review scope information
Appeal scope
Appeals should target the specific reviewed claim, evidence row, baseline concern, disclosure decision, or policy flag.
Why this status: appeals require reviewer handling and must stay within the reviewed issue.
appealable_review_scopereviewer_summary
Next step: If you think this review decision is wrong, appeal the specific claim that was reviewed. Appeals do not reopen unrelated moral disagreements by default.
How to read these screening results
These cards identify missing inputs and automatic screening results. They do not certify completion, additionality, or safety. A completed review must be supported by a scoped review record, not inferred from a URL, a score, or the absence of a flag.
Any mutually agreed public-safe evidence: redacted receipt, dated log, screenshot, photograph, completed work, public link, certificate, or third-party confirmation. Sensitive details may be removed. | Normally complete within 30 days of acceptance; any explicit longer period in either action governs. | trust level 1/5
Action evidence
Any mutually agreed public-safe evidence: redacted receipt, dated log, screenshot, photograph, completed work, public link, certificate, or third-party confirmation. Sensitive details may be removed.
Baseline confidence
Not assessed: Review should capture a dated no-trade baseline and any evidence that the agreement changed behavior.
Third-party externality review
Review whether the trade creates third-party harms, bad incentives, or objections from moral views not present in the match.
Who might object to this trade?
Could this create bad incentives?
Could this harm people or values not represented by the parties?
Does this proposal need external reviewer input?
Current status
open
Current discount
Effort-matched catalog pairing; subjective moral valuations may justify a different negotiated exchange.