I will produce a one-page coordination brief for one candidate moral public good, including the shared-value case, threshold logic, free-rider risk, evidence route, and material objections.
Requested in return
Submit one candidate public good with a source, identify the groups that may value it, and include one serious objection or externality concern.
Complete within ten days of a reviewable submission
Verification
A source-linked brief plus an explicit objection and evidence checklist
State
Live offer
Exposure
Exposure unknown
Condition
Reviewing
Protection
Review current terms
Funding, guarantees and verification
Moral public-good coordinationCandidate evaluation and dissent
Funding and verification details
Exposure unknownEvidence laterNeeds review
State
Live offer
Exposure
Exposure unknown
Condition
Reviewing
Protection
Review current terms
Overview
I will produce a one-page coordination brief for one candidate moral public good, including the shared-value case, threshold logic, free-rider risk, evidence route, and material objections.
Key details
Your action
Executes only after both sides accept frozen terms and evidence requirements.
Charge timing
No payment is authorized from this card. Any future charge requires the existing agreement payment path.
Verification
A source-linked brief plus an explicit objection and evidence checklist
Recipient
Recipient not selected
Verification & funding
Effect on this action: Requires adapter recheck. This is context, not a verdict.
Evidence: A source-linked brief plus an explicit objection and evidence checklist
Screening and review context
Review workflow
Why this record can or cannot be relied on yet
Each card exposes the current review state, factor codes, and the next human-controlled step before matching, disclosure, or completion trust.
current status
Awaiting reviewer
Status card
Status: open.
Why this status: the visible status is still a review state, not completion, custody, enforceability, or moral endorsement.
status_visiblehuman_review_required
Next step: Treat this as a review state, not a claim of completion, legal enforceability, custody, or moral endorsement.
action evidence
Information needed
Action evidence
No reviewable proof method is specified in this record.
Why this status: no reviewable proof method or evidence locator is attached yet.
evidence_rule_namedevidence_sufficiency
Next step: Attach or inspect one scoped artifact for each factual action claim before relying on the record.
baseline confidence
Not assessed
Counterfactual baseline
Not assessed: Review should capture a dated no-trade baseline and any evidence that the agreement changed behavior.
Why this status: a confidence heuristic is not a completed counterfactual review; a reviewer must inspect the dated no-trade evidence.
Research and coordination only. This proposal does not collect funds, promise matching, establish custody, or certify a recipient. Any funding path requires separate reviewed terms and provider evidence.
Moral public-good coordinationCandidate evaluation and dissentParticipant-stated importance 7/10Counterparty minimum acceptable importance 5+/10Confidence: Medium
Not a platform moral ranking. These scores reflect participant-stated views, not Moral Trade's assessment of moral value.
Proposed action
I will produce a one-page coordination brief for one candidate moral public good, including the shared-value case, threshold logic, free-rider risk, evidence route, and material objections.
Requested reciprocal action
Submit one candidate public good with a source, identify the groups that may value it, and include one serious objection or externality concern.
Compromise destination
Common-ground funding
Verification and term
A source-linked brief plus an explicit objection and evidence checklist | Complete within ten days of a reviewable submission | trust level 3/5
Action evidence
A source-linked brief plus an explicit objection and evidence checklist
Baseline confidence
Not assessed: Review should capture a dated no-trade baseline and any evidence that the agreement changed behavior.
Third-party externality review
Review whether the trade creates third-party harms, bad incentives, or objections from moral views not present in the match.
Who might object to this trade?
Could this create bad incentives?
Could this harm people or values not represented by the parties?
Does this proposal need external reviewer input?
Current status
open
Current discount
Non-financial research exchange.
Respond to this offer
Sign in or create an account to discuss this offer and agree on terms.
Operator review artifact v1 (not independent certification). Baseline: no coordination brief is produced without a reviewable candidate and objection. Evidence: source-linked candidate description, shared-value map, threshold and free-rider analysis, and explicit dissent. Money: no funds are collected and no match is promised. Externalities: at least one serious objection is required. Recourse: funding requires a separate reviewed workflow. Status: open proposal; manual review required before reliance.
Terms before theory
Guarantees and limits
Guarantees / rules
Executes only if threshold, match, or mutual-acceptance conditions clear.
Authorization is released or no obligation is created if conditions fail.
Evidence is required before reliance when the route names a verification standard.
Reviewer and challenge paths apply where the existing product supports them.
No public exposure by default for private messages, raw evidence, or contact details.
Anti-threat and safety policies apply before commitment reliance.
Limits
Moral value is not guaranteed.
Downstream impact is uncertain.
Counterfactual additionality is estimated, not proven.
Sponsor match may be capped or unavailable.
Tax treatment depends on jurisdiction.
Some information may stay unavailable until review.
Private messages, exact wishes, raw evidence, and contact details stay sign-in or reviewer gated.Saved-offer and interest state is not public by default.
baseline_credibility
Next step: What would you do if this trade did not happen? Be concrete. Mention your current intention, prior behavior, or any evidence that makes your baseline credible.
externality review
No listed trigger detected
Externality review
Review whether the trade creates third-party harms, bad incentives, or objections from moral views not present in the match.
Why this status: Automatic screening found no listed trigger. This does not establish that third-party harms were reviewed or ruled out.
externality_review_requiredhuman_review_required
Next step: Ask who is affected outside the two parties, what harm pathway exists, and what remedy or challenge window is available.
Next step: This score reflects the participant's own stated priorities. It is not a platform judgment about objective moral value.
appeal scope
Review scope information
Appeal scope
Appeals should target the specific reviewed claim, evidence row, baseline concern, disclosure decision, or policy flag.
Why this status: appeals require reviewer handling and must stay within the reviewed issue.
appealable_review_scopereviewer_summary
Next step: If you think this review decision is wrong, appeal the specific claim that was reviewed. Appeals do not reopen unrelated moral disagreements by default.
How to read these screening results
These cards identify missing inputs and automatic screening results. They do not certify completion, additionality, or safety. A completed review must be supported by a scoped review record, not inferred from a URL, a score, or the absence of a flag.
Ellen
Public comment |
Operator review artifact v1 (not independent certification). Baseline: no coordination brief is produced without a reviewable candidate and objection. Evidence: source-linked candidate description, shared-value map, threshold and free-rider analysis, and explicit dissent. Money: no funds are collected and no match is promised. Externalities: at least one serious objection is required. Recourse: funding requires a separate reviewed workflow. Status: open proposal; manual review required before reliance.