Personal pledge swap
Posted by Ellen. This dossier combines public terms, discussion, recommendations, interest, and transaction tracking in one record.
Marketplace terms
The marketplace view puts exposure, timing, verification, and failure rules before the full review dossier. It does not bypass the existing response, payment, or review gates.
Controlled live Every.org connector validation authorized by the proposer on 2026-07-23.
Terms before theory
Review workflow
Each card exposes the current review state, factor codes, and the next human-controlled step before matching, disclosure, or completion trust.
current status
human reviewStatus: open.
Why this status: human review: the visible status is still a review state, not completion, custody, enforceability, or moral endorsement.
action evidence
human reviewExternal payment records and completion evidence before any reliance.
Why this status: human review: a proof method is named, but the artifact still needs reviewer inspection before reliance.
baseline confidence
needs inputWeak: Review should capture a dated no-trade baseline and any evidence that the agreement changed behavior.
Why this status: needs input: the baseline is weak and needs dated no-trade evidence.
Offer dossier
Controlled live Every.org connector validation authorized by the proposer on 2026-07-23.
Not a platform moral ranking. These scores reflect participant-stated views, not Moral Trade's assessment of moral value.
Donate exactly $10.00 USD to The Against Malaria Foundation through the Every.org connector after both participants confirm the frozen agreement.
Eat one vegetarian meal after Moral Trade verifies the donation and activates the reciprocal commitment.
Not needed
The donation is verified only by the Every.org completed-donation webhook. For the meal, the responder submits a dated public-safe attestation describing the vegetarian meal; the proposer reviews and accepts or challenges it. Screenshots of donation receipts do not verify payment. | One-time trade. The meal occurs after provider verification; no ongoing dietary commitment. | trust level 1/5
External payment records and completion evidence before any reliance.
Weak: Review should capture a dated no-trade baseline and any evidence that the agreement changed behavior.
Review whether the trade creates third-party harms, bad incentives, or objections from moral views not present in the match.
Recommendations
Owners can recommend other users' offers from their own offer pages. These public links help people trace trust and substantive overlap.
Owner-published recommendations will appear here once they are added.
Public comments
Each offer has a public comment thread. Comments can be nested, voted on once per user, and linked back to public member profiles.
Use comments for clarifications, objections, and structured follow-up.
Donate exactly $10.00 USD to The Against Malaria Foundation through the Every.org connector after both participants confirm the frozen agreement.
Effect on this action: Requires adapter recheck. This is context, not a verdict.
Donation evidence: Receipt from recipient route
Live offer · Live
Global health and poverty donation → Animal-welfare donation
No commitment was created.
externality review
passReview whether the trade creates third-party harms, bad incentives, or objections from moral views not present in the match.
Why this status: pass: no offset, payment, or political-adjacent trigger was detected.
participant relative scores
passParticipant-stated importance 5/10; counterparty minimum 5/10. Confidence: Low.
Why this status: pass: scores are bounded as participant-stated context, not platform ranking.
appeal scope
human reviewAppeals should target the specific reviewed claim, evidence row, baseline concern, disclosure decision, or policy flag.
Why this status: human review: appeals require reviewer handling and must stay within the reviewed issue.
Participant action guide
These prompts are pulled from the public review-workflow contract, so the page shows the same baseline, evidence, safety, score, and appeal instructions that validators check.
Baseline helper
What would you do if this trade did not happen? Be concrete. Mention your current intention, prior behavior, or any evidence that makes your baseline credible.
Needs evidence status
Status: Needs evidence. Your draft is structurally complete, but no reviewable proof method has been attached yet.
Safety boundary
This proposal cannot be published because it resembles a threat, coercive compensation request, or newly escalated harmful behavior.
Participant importance
This score reflects the participant's own stated priorities. It is not a platform judgment about objective moral value.
Appeal scope
If you think this review decision is wrong, appeal the specific claim that was reviewed. Appeals do not reopen unrelated moral disagreements by default.
open
No discount or reduced burden has been published.
Respond to this offer
Contact and response paths stay sign-in and consent gated. Create an account or sign in before sending a message so private wishes, contact details, and agreement history remain tied to a member-controlled record.