Skip to main content
Moral Trade
Understand▾
UnderstandStart with the idea, source, and safest first route.
Choose your pathRoute by intent: learn, test an example, donate, or join/build.What is Moral Trade?A plain-language primer for new visitors.How it worksA simple walkthrough from example to review.SourcesPrimary references and product-boundary notes.FAQCommon questions and operating limits.
Explore▾
ExploreInspect what is live enough to read, clone, or donate through.
ProjectsWhat is live, illustrative, or upcoming.Worked examplesSeeded structures, not live offers.All offersLive offers and worked examples.Pledge swapsExchange bounded commitments.Donation offsetsRedirect matched opposed donations.Donate through a routeUse a vetted external donation handoff.
Join▾
JoinMove from examples into one supported pilot action.
Create bounded tradeDraft terms with baseline, exit, evidence, and review gates.Create donation offsetSet baseline, match, destination, surplus, and evidence rules.Create wish profileDescribe broad wishes before mutual disclosure.Founding cohortInvite one serious counterparty and start small.Private matchingConsent-gated counterparty discovery.Create accountUse member workflows after the public primer.
Trust▾
TrustCheck status, review rules, safety boundaries, and recourse.
AboutWhat exists today, what does not, and what comes next.What you can rely onPrototype guarantees, review states, and non-guarantees.Pilot statusWhat is real, reviewed, or still prototype-stage.ValidationEvidence states, challenge windows, and review scopes.SafetyCoercion, fraud, and pressure boundaries.Anti-threat rulesBaseline integrity and externality checks.AccessibilityWCAG-oriented QA scope, limitations, and support route.MeasurementPrivacy-safe event taxonomy and performance baselines.TransparencyAggregate review, disclosure, report, appeal, and operator timing counts.Team and governanceOperator routes, reviewer roles, and public gaps.Pilot updatesPublic logs, governance updates, and case-study notes.ContactReach the pilot operators or report a support issue.
Search
See exampleSign in
  1. Home
  2. Browse offers

Browse offers

Explore live offers and worked examples by cause area, format, evidence method, and review state.

0 live offers8 worked examples
Examples are first today.

The live directory has no public offers yet, so this page opens on reviewed examples that show the expected structure.

Create an offerSave search
About this pilot

Moral Trade currently prioritizes donation offsets, moral public goods, and bounded pledge swaps because they have clearer baselines, evidence, and review states. Paid action offers remain deferred while identity, dispute, and compliance workflows mature.

Offset guideValidation rules
Live offers0Worked examples8All8
Worked example, not live liquidityThese are past or simulated agreements for learning.
Manual review before relianceReview terms and evidence before adapting an example.

Showing 0 results in live offers.

Grid view

Moral Trade

A pilot institution for cooperation under disagreement.

Moral Trade helps serious participants test small, reviewable commitments across moral disagreement. It does not provide legal, tax, escrow, or custody services.

Marketplace

  • Projects
  • Choose your path
  • Browse offers
  • Worked examples
  • Pledge swaps
  • Donation offsets
  • Donate through a route
  • Public Goods Fund
  • Private matching

Learn

  • About
  • What is moral trade?
  • How it works
  • Methodology
  • Measurement
  • Transparency report
  • Safety policy
  • Anti-threat rules
  • Validation
  • Accessibility
  • Moral Trade technical spec
  • Evidence standards
  • FAQ
  • Deferred paid offers
  • Sources

Community

  • Team and governance
  • People
  • Wish registry
  • Founding cohort
  • Pilot updates
  • Create account
  • Sign in

About

  • Contact
  • Pilot status
  • What you can rely on
  • Transparency report
List view
Popular filters
Animal welfareVerified offsetsBounded pledge swapsWorked examplesManual review required
Active filters
Live offersSearch: Global healthList view
Reset filters
Filters

Filters

Clear
Cause area

No cause facets available for this view.

Format

No formats available for this view.

Evidence and duration
Review status
Impact scores
Match state

Directory

0 listings

Sorted by newest.

No live offers yet.

Browse worked examples or create the first public offer. The live directory is still in pilot mode.

View worked examplesCreate trade

Worked examples

Study the structure before live offers arrive.

Open all examples

These examples are not live liquidity. They show the terms, evidence rules, baseline checks, and review states a public offer would need before anyone relies on it.

Worked exampleAnnual receiptsManual review required

Personal pledge swap

Victoria: Global poverty for Animal welfare

Victoria

A 12 months personal pledge swap with annual receipts evidence and moderate baseline confidence.

Global poverty <-> Animal welfare

Offered action
Donate 1% of my income to an evidence-backed poverty charity for 12 months.
Requested action
Adopt a vegetarian diet for 12 months.
Personal pledge swap12 monthsAnnual receiptsParticipant-stated importance 7/10Counterparty minimum acceptable importance 8/10Confidence: Medium

Not a platform moral ranking. This score reflects the participant's stated view, not Moral Trade's assessment of moral value.

Action evidenceReceipts, donation records, and an annual review checkpoint.
Baseline confidenceModerate
Externality reviewReview whether the trade creates third-party harms, bad incentives, or objections from moral views not present in the match.
Factor codes
human_review_requiredevidence_rule_namedbaseline_credibilityexternality_review_requiredno_global_moral_ranking

Before you rely on a listing

Evidence first, pressure never.

  • Voluntary terms only
  • Evidence must be named before reliance
  • Baseline confidence is separate from action evidence
  • Third-party objections can trigger external review
  • Review states appear on every card
  • No escrow, custody, legal, or tax service
  • Safety boundaries apply to every offer
MethodologyEvidence standardsSafety policy

Account workspace

Sign in to save interest and create offers.

Accounts keep draft terms, saved offers, and evidence workflows separate from public worked examples.

Create accountSign in
Pilot modeIllustrative fit rankingShow examples

During the seeded pilot, these examples help visitors inspect structure without implying real marketplace rankings or live cost-efficiency results.

Global poverty

Victoria: Global poverty for Animal welfare

Donate 1% of my income to an evidence-backed poverty charity for 12 months.

Inspect example

Animal welfare

Victoria: Global poverty for Animal welfare

Donate 1% of my income to an evidence-backed poverty charity for 12 months.

Inspect example

Climate

Nia: Climate for Public health

Replace two weekly car trips with transit and contribute monthly to a climate resilience fund.

Inspect example

Public health

Nia: Climate for Public health

Replace two weekly car trips with transit and contribute monthly to a climate resilience fund.

Inspect example

Due diligence

Learn more about evidence and process.

Marketplace cards summarize terms for scanning. The full methodology and evidence standards explain how review works before anyone relies on an offer.

Methodology

How Moral Trade distinguishes voluntary exchange from threats, fraud, and pressure.

Evidence standards

How action records, receipts, witnesses, and manual review are presented.

Validation rulebook

Reviewer scope, evidence states, challenge windows, and proof uniqueness checks.

Anti-threat baseline rules

No threat creation, no compensation for newly escalated harmful behavior, and third-party externality review.

Safety policy

Boundaries for coercion, harassment, political contribution offsets, and risky asks.

  • Research and governance
  • Reasoning Center
  • Allocation notes
  • Candidate pools

    • Legal

    • Privacy
    • Terms
    • Accessibility
    • Safety policy
    • Evidence review

    Reference points include Toby Ord's paper on moral trade and Forethought's discussion of convergence, compromise, threats, blockers, and moral public goods.

    Next step: Attach or inspect one scoped artifact for each factual action claim before relying on the record.

    Why this status: human review: a proof method is named, but the artifact still needs reviewer inspection before reliance.

    Worked example; manual review required before reliance

    View detailsCreate similar
    Worked exampleAnnual receiptsManual review required

    Personal pledge swap

    Paul: Animal welfare for Global poverty

    Paul

    A 12 months personal pledge swap with annual receipts evidence and moderate baseline confidence.

    Animal welfare <-> Global poverty

    Offered action
    Go vegetarian for 12 months, with a yearly check-in and visible meal log.
    Requested action
    Donate 1% of income to an effective poverty fund for the same period.
    Personal pledge swap12 monthsAnnual receiptsParticipant-stated importance 8/10Counterparty minimum acceptable importance 7/10Confidence: Medium

    Not a platform moral ranking. This score reflects the participant's stated view, not Moral Trade's assessment of moral value.

    Action evidenceReceipts, donation records, and an annual review checkpoint.
    Baseline confidenceModerate
    Externality reviewReview whether the trade creates third-party harms, bad incentives, or objections from moral views not present in the match.
    Factor codes
    human_review_requiredevidence_rule_namedbaseline_credibilityexternality_review_requiredno_global_moral_ranking

    Next step: Attach or inspect one scoped artifact for each factual action claim before relying on the record.

    Why this status: human review: a proof method is named, but the artifact still needs reviewer inspection before reliance.

    Worked example; manual review required before reliance

    View detailsCreate similar
    Worked examplePublic pledgeManual review required

    Personal pledge swap

    Nia: Climate for Public health

    Nia

    A 6 months personal pledge swap with public pledge evidence and weak baseline confidence.

    Climate <-> Public health

    Offered action
    Replace two weekly car trips with transit and contribute monthly to a climate resilience fund.
    Requested action
    Volunteer four hours each month with a vaccination or clinic outreach effort.
    Personal pledge swap6 monthsPublic pledgeParticipant-stated importance 7/10Counterparty minimum acceptable importance 6/10Confidence: Low

    Not a platform moral ranking. This score reflects the participant's stated view, not Moral Trade's assessment of moral value.

    Action evidenceA dated public pledge plus light follow-up evidence.
    Baseline confidenceWeak
    Externality reviewReview whether the trade creates third-party harms, bad incentives, or objections from moral views not present in the match.
    Factor codes
    human_review_requiredevidence_rule_namedbaseline_credibilityexternality_review_requiredno_global_moral_ranking

    Next step: Attach or inspect one scoped artifact for each factual action claim before relying on the record.

    Why this status: human review: a proof method is named, but the artifact still needs reviewer inspection before reliance.

    Worked example; manual review required before reliance

    View detailsCreate similar