Skip to main content
Moral Trade
Understand▾
UnderstandStart with the idea, source, and safest first route.
Choose your pathRoute by intent: learn, test an example, donate, or join/build.What is Moral Trade?A plain-language primer for new visitors.How it worksA simple walkthrough from example to review.SourcesPrimary references and product-boundary notes.FAQCommon questions and operating limits.
Explore▾
ExploreInspect what is live enough to read, clone, or donate through.
ProjectsWhat is live, illustrative, or upcoming.Worked examplesSeeded structures, not live offers.All offersLive offers and worked examples.Pledge swapsExchange bounded commitments.Donation offsetsRedirect matched opposed donations.Donate through a routeUse a vetted external donation handoff.
Join▾
JoinMove from examples into one supported pilot action.
Create bounded tradeDraft terms with baseline, exit, evidence, and review gates.Create donation offsetSet baseline, match, destination, surplus, and evidence rules.Create wish profileDescribe broad wishes before mutual disclosure.Founding cohortInvite one serious counterparty and start small.Private matchingConsent-gated counterparty discovery.Create accountUse member workflows after the public primer.
Trust▾
TrustCheck status, review rules, safety boundaries, and recourse.
AboutWhat exists today, what does not, and what comes next.What you can rely onPrototype guarantees, review states, and non-guarantees.Pilot statusWhat is real, reviewed, or still prototype-stage.ValidationEvidence states, challenge windows, and review scopes.SafetyCoercion, fraud, and pressure boundaries.Anti-threat rulesBaseline integrity and externality checks.AccessibilityWCAG-oriented QA scope, limitations, and support route.MeasurementPrivacy-safe event taxonomy and performance baselines.TransparencyAggregate review, disclosure, report, appeal, and operator timing counts.Team and governanceOperator routes, reviewer roles, and public gaps.Pilot updatesPublic logs, governance updates, and case-study notes.ContactReach the pilot operators or report a support issue.
Search
See exampleSign in
  1. Home
  2. Browse offers

Browse offers

Explore live offers and worked examples by cause area, format, evidence method, and review state.

0 live offers8 worked examples
Examples are first today.

The live directory has no public offers yet, so this page opens on reviewed examples that show the expected structure.

Create an offerSave search
About this pilot

Moral Trade currently prioritizes donation offsets, moral public goods, and bounded pledge swaps because they have clearer baselines, evidence, and review states. Paid action offers remain deferred while identity, dispute, and compliance workflows mature.

Offset guideValidation rules
Live offers0Worked examples8All8
Worked example, not live liquidityThese are past or simulated agreements for learning.
Manual review before relianceReview terms and evidence before adapting an example.

Showing 8 results in worked examples.

Moral Trade

A pilot institution for cooperation under disagreement.

Moral Trade helps serious participants test small, reviewable commitments across moral disagreement. It does not provide legal, tax, escrow, or custody services.

Marketplace

  • Projects
  • Choose your path
  • Browse offers
  • Worked examples
  • Pledge swaps
  • Donation offsets
  • Donate through a route
  • Public Goods Fund
  • Private matching

Learn

  • About
  • What is moral trade?
  • How it works
  • Methodology
  • Measurement
  • Transparency report
  • Safety policy
  • Anti-threat rules
  • Validation
  • Accessibility
  • Moral Trade technical spec
  • Evidence standards
  • FAQ
  • Deferred paid offers
  • Sources

Community

  • Team and governance
  • People
  • Wish registry
  • Founding cohort
  • Pilot updates
  • Create account
  • Sign in

About

  • Contact
  • Pilot status
  • What you can rely on
  • Transparency report
Grid viewList view
Popular filters
Animal welfareVerified offsetsBounded pledge swapsWorked examplesManual review required
Filters

Filters

Clear
Cause area
Format
Evidence and duration
Review status
Impact scores
Match state

Directory

8 listings

Sorted by newest.

Global poverty (2)Climate (2)Animal welfare (2)Other causes (2)

Global poverty

2 listings
Worked exampleAnnual receiptsManual review required

Personal pledge swap

Victoria: Global poverty for Animal welfare

Victoria

A 12 months personal pledge swap with annual receipts evidence and moderate baseline confidence.

Global poverty <-> Animal welfare

Offered action
Donate 1% of my income to an evidence-backed poverty charity for 12 months.
Requested action
Adopt a vegetarian diet for 12 months.
Personal pledge swap12 monthsAnnual receiptsParticipant-stated importance 7/10Counterparty minimum acceptable importance 8/10Confidence: Medium

Not a platform moral ranking. This score reflects the participant's stated view, not Moral Trade's assessment of moral value.

Action evidenceReceipts, donation records, and an annual review checkpoint.
Baseline confidenceModerate
Externality reviewReview whether the trade creates third-party harms, bad incentives, or objections from moral views not present in the match.

Before you rely on a listing

Evidence first, pressure never.

  • Voluntary terms only
  • Evidence must be named before reliance
  • Baseline confidence is separate from action evidence
  • Third-party objections can trigger external review
  • Review states appear on every card
  • No escrow, custody, legal, or tax service
  • Safety boundaries apply to every offer
MethodologyEvidence standardsSafety policy

Account workspace

Sign in to save interest and create offers.

Accounts keep draft terms, saved offers, and evidence workflows separate from public worked examples.

Create accountSign in
Pilot modeIllustrative fit rankingShow examples

During the seeded pilot, these examples help visitors inspect structure without implying real marketplace rankings or live cost-efficiency results.

Global poverty

Victoria: Global poverty for Animal welfare

Donate 1% of my income to an evidence-backed poverty charity for 12 months.

Inspect example

Animal welfare

Victoria: Global poverty for Animal welfare

Donate 1% of my income to an evidence-backed poverty charity for 12 months.

Inspect example

Climate

Nia: Climate for Public health

Replace two weekly car trips with transit and contribute monthly to a climate resilience fund.

Inspect example

Public health

Nia: Climate for Public health

Replace two weekly car trips with transit and contribute monthly to a climate resilience fund.

Inspect example

Due diligence

Learn more about evidence and process.

Marketplace cards summarize terms for scanning. The full methodology and evidence standards explain how review works before anyone relies on an offer.

Methodology

How Moral Trade distinguishes voluntary exchange from threats, fraud, and pressure.

Evidence standards

How action records, receipts, witnesses, and manual review are presented.

Validation rulebook

Reviewer scope, evidence states, challenge windows, and proof uniqueness checks.

Anti-threat baseline rules

No threat creation, no compensation for newly escalated harmful behavior, and third-party externality review.

Safety policy

Boundaries for coercion, harassment, political contribution offsets, and risky asks.

  • Research and governance
  • Reasoning Center
  • Allocation notes
  • Candidate pools

    • Legal

    • Privacy
    • Terms
    • Accessibility
    • Safety policy
    • Evidence review

    Reference points include Toby Ord's paper on moral trade and Forethought's discussion of convergence, compromise, threats, blockers, and moral public goods.

    Factor codes
    human_review_requiredevidence_rule_namedbaseline_credibilityexternality_review_requiredno_global_moral_ranking

    Next step: Attach or inspect one scoped artifact for each factual action claim before relying on the record.

    Why this status: human review: a proof method is named, but the artifact still needs reviewer inspection before reliance.

    Worked example; manual review required before reliance

    View detailsCreate similar
    Worked exampleAnnual receiptsManual review required

    Personal pledge swap

    Paul: Animal welfare for Global poverty

    Paul

    A 12 months personal pledge swap with annual receipts evidence and moderate baseline confidence.

    Animal welfare <-> Global poverty

    Offered action
    Go vegetarian for 12 months, with a yearly check-in and visible meal log.
    Requested action
    Donate 1% of income to an effective poverty fund for the same period.
    Personal pledge swap12 monthsAnnual receiptsParticipant-stated importance 8/10Counterparty minimum acceptable importance 7/10Confidence: Medium

    Not a platform moral ranking. This score reflects the participant's stated view, not Moral Trade's assessment of moral value.

    Action evidenceReceipts, donation records, and an annual review checkpoint.
    Baseline confidenceModerate
    Externality reviewReview whether the trade creates third-party harms, bad incentives, or objections from moral views not present in the match.
    Factor codes
    human_review_requiredevidence_rule_namedbaseline_credibilityexternality_review_requiredno_global_moral_ranking

    Next step: Attach or inspect one scoped artifact for each factual action claim before relying on the record.

    Why this status: human review: a proof method is named, but the artifact still needs reviewer inspection before reliance.

    Worked example; manual review required before reliance

    View detailsCreate similar

    Climate

    2 listings
    Worked examplePublic pledgeManual review required

    Personal pledge swap

    Nia: Climate for Public health

    Nia

    A 6 months personal pledge swap with public pledge evidence and weak baseline confidence.

    Climate <-> Public health

    Offered action
    Replace two weekly car trips with transit and contribute monthly to a climate resilience fund.
    Requested action
    Volunteer four hours each month with a vaccination or clinic outreach effort.
    Personal pledge swap6 monthsPublic pledgeParticipant-stated importance 7/10Counterparty minimum acceptable importance 6/10Confidence: Low

    Not a platform moral ranking. This score reflects the participant's stated view, not Moral Trade's assessment of moral value.

    Action evidenceA dated public pledge plus light follow-up evidence.
    Baseline confidenceWeak
    Externality reviewReview whether the trade creates third-party harms, bad incentives, or objections from moral views not present in the match.
    Factor codes
    human_review_requiredevidence_rule_namedbaseline_credibilityexternality_review_requiredno_global_moral_ranking

    Next step: Attach or inspect one scoped artifact for each factual action claim before relying on the record.

    Why this status: human review: a proof method is named, but the artifact still needs reviewer inspection before reliance.

    Worked example; manual review required before reliance

    View detailsCreate similar
    Worked examplePublic pledgeManual review required

    Personal pledge swap

    Omar: Public health for Climate

    Omar

    A 6 months personal pledge swap with public pledge evidence and weak baseline confidence.

    Public health <-> Climate

    Offered action
    Volunteer four hours monthly with a community health campaign.
    Requested action
    Cut two weekly car trips and redirect the savings into climate resilience.
    Personal pledge swap6 monthsPublic pledgeParticipant-stated importance 6/10Counterparty minimum acceptable importance 6/10Confidence: Low

    Not a platform moral ranking. This score reflects the participant's stated view, not Moral Trade's assessment of moral value.

    Action evidenceA dated public pledge plus light follow-up evidence.
    Baseline confidenceWeak
    Externality reviewReview whether the trade creates third-party harms, bad incentives, or objections from moral views not present in the match.
    Factor codes
    human_review_requiredevidence_rule_namedbaseline_credibilityexternality_review_requiredno_global_moral_ranking

    Next step: Attach or inspect one scoped artifact for each factual action claim before relying on the record.

    Why this status: human review: a proof method is named, but the artifact still needs reviewer inspection before reliance.

    Worked example; manual review required before reliance

    View detailsCreate similar

    Animal welfare

    2 listings
    Worked examplePayment pending verificationManual review required

    Paid action offer

    Lina: Financial support for Animal welfare

    Lina

    A 12 months paid action offer with payment pending verification evidence and weak baseline confidence.

    Financial support <-> Animal welfare

    Offered action
    Pay $600 in three installments if someone adopts a vegetarian diet for 12 months.
    Requested action
    Adopt a vegetarian diet for 12 months with monthly check-ins and a simple meal log.
    Paid action offer12 monthsPayment pending verificationParticipant-stated importance 7/10Counterparty minimum acceptable importance 6/10Confidence: High

    Not a platform moral ranking. This score reflects the participant's stated view, not Moral Trade's assessment of moral value.

    Action evidenceExternal payment records and completion evidence before any reliance.
    Baseline confidenceWeak
    Externality reviewCheck whether payment could reward strategic delay, newly escalated behavior, or pressure on vulnerable people.
    Factor codes
    human_review_requiredevidence_rule_namedbaseline_credibilityexternality_review_requiredno_global_moral_ranking

    Next step: Attach or inspect one scoped artifact for each factual action claim before relying on the record.

    Why this status: human review: a proof method is named, but the artifact still needs reviewer inspection before reliance.

    Worked example; manual review required before reliance

    View detailsCreate similar
    Worked examplePayment pending verificationManual review required

    Paid action offer

    Marco: Animal welfare for Financial support

    Marco

    A 12 months paid action offer with payment pending verification evidence and weak baseline confidence.

    Animal welfare <-> Financial support

    Offered action
    Adopt a vegetarian diet for 12 months, with monthly check-ins and a shared meal tracker.
    Requested action
    Receive $600 over the year if I follow through.
    Paid action offer12 monthsPayment pending verificationParticipant-stated importance 6/10Counterparty minimum acceptable importance 6/10Confidence: High

    Not a platform moral ranking. This score reflects the participant's stated view, not Moral Trade's assessment of moral value.

    Action evidenceExternal payment records and completion evidence before any reliance.
    Baseline confidenceWeak
    Externality reviewCheck whether payment could reward strategic delay, newly escalated behavior, or pressure on vulnerable people.
    Factor codes
    human_review_requiredevidence_rule_namedbaseline_credibilityexternality_review_requiredno_global_moral_ranking

    Next step: Attach or inspect one scoped artifact for each factual action claim before relying on the record.

    Why this status: human review: a proof method is named, but the artifact still needs reviewer inspection before reliance.

    Worked example; manual review required before reliance

    View details

    Other causes

    2 listings
    Worked exampleManual review requiredManual review required

    Donation offset

    Rebecca: Gun rights for Gun control

    Rebecca

    A 3 months donation offset with manual review required evidence and moderate baseline confidence.

    Gun rights <-> Gun control

    Offered action
    Redirect $1,000 I would have sent to gun-rights lobbying into a global poverty fund.
    Requested action
    Redirect $1,000 you would have sent to gun-control lobbying into the same global poverty fund.
    Donation offset3 monthsManual review requiredParticipant-stated importance 8/10Counterparty minimum acceptable importance 7/10Confidence: High

    Not a platform moral ranking. This score reflects the participant's stated view, not Moral Trade's assessment of moral value.

    Action evidenceReviewer inspection of the named evidence before reliance.
    Baseline confidenceModerate
    Externality reviewPolitical-adjacent case study. Keep below lower-risk examples and require externality review for affected communities and unrepresented values.
    Factor codes
    human_review_requiredevidence_rule_namedbaseline_credibilityexternality_review_requiredno_global_moral_ranking

    Next step: Ask who is affected outside the two parties, what harm pathway exists, and what remedy or challenge window is available.

    Why this status: human review: the mode or causes can affect third parties, incentives, or unrepresented values.

    Worked example; manual review required before reliance

    View detailsCreate similar
    Worked exampleManual review requiredManual review required

    Donation offset

    Christopher: Gun control for Gun rights

    Christopher

    A 3 months donation offset with manual review required evidence and moderate baseline confidence.

    Gun control <-> Gun rights

    Offered action
    Redirect $1,000 I would have sent to gun-control lobbying into the same global poverty fund.
    Requested action
    Redirect $1,000 you would have sent to gun-rights lobbying into that poverty fund.
    Donation offset3 monthsManual review requiredParticipant-stated importance 8/10Counterparty minimum acceptable importance 7/10Confidence: High

    Not a platform moral ranking. This score reflects the participant's stated view, not Moral Trade's assessment of moral value.

    Action evidenceReviewer inspection of the named evidence before reliance.
    Baseline confidenceModerate
    Externality reviewPolitical-adjacent case study. Keep below lower-risk examples and require externality review for affected communities and unrepresented values.
    Factor codes
    human_review_requiredevidence_rule_namedbaseline_credibilityexternality_review_requiredno_global_moral_ranking

    Next step: Ask who is affected outside the two parties, what harm pathway exists, and what remedy or challenge window is available.

    Why this status: human review: the mode or causes can affect third parties, incentives, or unrepresented values.

    Worked example; manual review required before reliance

    Create similar
    View details
    Create similar